Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography versus hysterosalpingography during fertility work-up: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the costs and effects of tubal patency testing by hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) compared to hysterosalpingography (HSG) in infertile women during the fertility work-up? SUMMARY ANSWER: During the fertility work-up, clinical management based on the test results of HyFoSy leads to slightly lower, though not statistically significant, live birth rates, at lower costs, compared to management based on HSG results. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Traditionally, tubal patency testing during the fertility work-up is performed by HSG. The FOAM trial, formally a non-inferiority study, showed that management decisions based on the results of HyFoSy resulted in a comparable live birth rate at 12 months compared to HSG (46% versus 47%; difference -1.2%, 95% CI: -3.4% to 1.5%; P = 0.27). Compared to HSG, HyFoSy is associated with significantly less pain, it lacks ionizing radiation and exposure to iodinated contrast medium. Moreover, HyFoSy can be performed by a gynaecologist during a one-stop fertility work-up. To our knowledge, the costs of both strategies have never been compared. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed an economic evaluation alongside the FOAM trial, a randomized multicenter study conducted in the Netherlands. Participating infertile women underwent, both HyFoSy and HSG, in a randomized order. The results of both tests were compared and women with discordant test results were randomly allocated to management based on the results of one of the tests. The follow-up period was twelve months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We studied 1160 infertile women (18-41 years) scheduled for tubal patency testing. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth. The economic evaluation compared costs and effects of management based on either test within 12 months. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs): the difference in total costs and chance of live birth. Data were analyzed using the intention to treat principle. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Between May 2015 and January 2019, 1026 of the 1160 women underwent both tubal tests and had data available: 747 women with concordant results (48% live births), 136 with inconclusive results (40% live births), and 143 with discordant results (41% had a live birth after management based on HyFoSy results versus 49% with live birth after management based on HSG results). When comparing the two strategies-management based on HyfoSy results versus HSG results-the estimated chance of live birth was 46% after HyFoSy versus 47% after HSG (difference -1.2%; 95% CI: -3.4% to 1.5%). For the procedures itself, HyFoSy cost €136 and HSG €280. When costs of additional fertility treatments were incorporated, the mean total costs per couple were €3307 for the HyFoSy strategy and €3427 for the HSG strategy (mean difference €-119; 95% CI: €-125 to €-114). So, while HyFoSy led to lower costs per couple, live birth rates were also slightly lower. The ICER was €10 042, meaning that by using HyFoSy instead of HSG we would save €10 042 per each additional live birth lost. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: When interpreting the results of this study, it needs to be considered that there was a considerable uncertainty around the ICER, and that the direct fertility enhancing effect of both tubal patency tests was not incorporated as women underwent both tubal patency tests in this study. WIDER IMPLICATION OF THE FINDINGS: Compared to clinical management based on HSG results, management guided by HyFoSy leads to slightly lower live birth rates (though not statistically significant) at lower costs, less pain, without ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast exposure. Further research on the comparison of the direct fertility-enhancing effect of both tubal patency tests is needed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): FOAM trial was an investigator-initiated study, funded by ZonMw, a Dutch organization for Health Research and Development (project number 837001504). IQ Medical Ventures provided the ExEm®-FOAM kits free of charge. The funders had no role in study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data. K.D. reports travel-and speakers fees from Guerbet and her department received research grants from Guerbet outside the submitted work. H.R.V. received consulting-and travel fee from Ferring. A.M.v.P. reports received consulting fee from DEKRA and fee for an expert meeting from Ferring, both outside the submitted work. C.H.d.K. received travel fee from Merck. F.J.M.B. received a grant from Merck and speakers fee from Besins Healthcare. F.J.M.B. is a member of the advisory board of Merck and Ferring. J.v.D. reported speakers fee from Ferring. J.S. reports a research agreement with Takeda and consultancy for Sanofi on MR of motility outside the submitted work. M.v.W. received a travel grant from Oxford Press in the role of deputy editor for Human Reproduction and participates in a DSMB as independent methodologist in obstetrics studies in which she has no other role. B.W.M. received an investigator grant from NHMRC GNT1176437. B.W.M. reports consultancy for ObsEva, Merck, Guerbet, iGenomix, and Merck KGaA and travel support from Merck KGaA. V.M. received research grants from Guerbet, Merck, and Ferring and travel and speakers fees from Guerbet. The other authors do not report conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: International Clinical Trials Registry Platform No. NTR4746.

Contrast media for hysterosalpingography: systematic search and review providing new guidelines by the Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

OBJECTIVES: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is widely used for evaluating the fallopian tubes; however, controversies regarding the use of water- or oil-based iodine-based contrast media (CM) remain. The aim of this work was (1) to discuss reported pregnancy rates related to the CM type used, (2) to validate the used CM in published literature, (3) to discuss possible complications and side effects of CM in HSG, and (4) to develop guidelines on the use of oil-based CM in HSG. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted for original RCT studies or review/meta-analyses on using water-based and oil-based CM in HSG with fertility outcomes and complications. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 10 reviews/meta-analyses were analyzed. Grading of the literature was performed based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) 2011 classification. RESULTS: An approximately 10% higher pregnancy rate is reported for oil-based CM. Side effects are rare, but oil-based CM have potentially more side effects on the maternal thyroid function and the peritoneum. CONCLUSIONS: 1. HSG with oil-based CM gives approximately 10% higher pregnancy rates. 2. External validity is limited, as in five of nine RCTs, the CM used is no longer on the market. 3. Oil-based CM have potentially more side effects on the maternal thyroid function and on the peritoneum. 4. Guideline: Maternal thyroid function should be tested before HSG with oil-based CM and monitored for 6 months after. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Oil-based CM is associated with an approximately 10% higher chance of pregnancy compared to water-based CM after HSG. Although side effects are rare, higher iodine concentration and slower clearance of oil-based CM may induce maternal thyroid function disturbance and peritoneal inflammation and granuloma formation. KEY POINTS: • It is unknown which type of contrast medium, oil-based or water-based, is the optimal for HSG. • Oil-based contrast media give a 10% higher chance of pregnancy after HSG, compared to water-based contrast media. • From the safety perspective, oil-based CM can cause thyroid dysfunction and an intra-abdominal inflammatory response in the patient.

Effect of radiation on serum anti-Müllerian hormone during hysterosalpingography in female infertility.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does radiation exposure during hysterosalpingography (HSG) negatively affect serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in infertile women? DESIGN: Prospective cohort study conducted at Songklanagarind Hospital, Thailand, between April 2021 and May 2023. Thirty-two infertile women and 34 control participants were enrolled. Serum AMH levels were assessed in the infertile group at baseline before the HSG procedure and at 1 and 3 months after the procedure. Control participants, who self-reported no medical conditions, underwent the same AMH level assessments. Changes in serum AMH levels were compared. RESULTS: Infertile women had a mean age of 32.4 ± 3.8 years, body mass index of 21.2 ± 2.0 kg/m2 and baseline mean AMH level of 3.66 ng/ml (95% CI 3.00 to 4.32), which did not significantly differ from the control group. One month after HSG, mean AMH level significantly declined (0.33 ng/ml, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.01; P = 0.045) in the infertile group. The change in serum AMH levels between baseline and 1 month was significantly different in the HSG group compared with controls (-0.33 ng/ml, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.01 versus 0.36 ng/ml, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.67; P = 0.002). Changes in serum AMH levels from baseline to 3 months did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: One month after the HSG, infertile women experienced a significant decrease in serum AMH levels compared with controls. The change in serum AMH levels between baseline and 3 months after HSG did not significantly differ from that of the control group.

A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Role of Combined Diagnostic Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy in the Management of Female Infertility.

Introduction Infertility affects approximately 10-15% of couples worldwide. Hysteroscopy and laparoscopy are two newer modalities available for the evaluation of infertility and are complementary rather than mutually exclusive. Each provides useful information that the other may not have and each has its advantages. Materials and methods A total of 75 patients of female infertility (study group) in the age group of 18-40 years from the Outpatient Department (OPD) were recruited. Infertility was defined as one year of unprotected intercourse without pregnancy. Hysteroscopy and laparoscopy were carried out in each patient at the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Hysteroscopic findings were compared with laparoscopic findings for uterine and tubal pathology. Hysteroscopy as a procedure was also compared with laparoscopy as a one-step procedure for diagnostic accuracy in investigating a case of female infertility. The data was analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Version 29.0, Armonk, NY). Observations and results In our study, out of a total of 75 cases evaluated for infertility, primary infertility patients were 48 (64%) and secondary infertility patients were 27 (36%). In our study, both tubes were patent on chromopertubation in primary infertility (PI) vs secondary infertility (SI) in 49.33% vs 21.33% of total cases. Both tubes were blocked in PI vs SI in 9.33% vs 8% of total cases. In our study, 20 patients (26.66%) underwent hysteroscopic intervention. Adhesiolysis was the commonest procedure required in seven (9.33%) followed by hysteroscopic cannulation in six (8%). In our study, a total of 30 procedures were performed in 20 patients during laparoscopy. The most common procedure required was ovarian drilling in 22.66% (17/75) followed by surgery for endometriosis in 10.66% (8/75). Adhesiolysis was required in 5/75 (6.66%). Both laparoscopy and hysteroscopy were normal in 44/75 cases for uterine findings. Conclusion Thus, hysterolaparoscopy as "one step" had various advantages in our study, more accuracy in the findings and therapeutic intervention in the same sitting reducing the cost. The addition of hysteroscopy to laparoscopy is invaluable in the infertility workup as it has a definite edge in the detection of uterine pathology, as well as being therapeutic at the same time. More accuracy in the diagnostic findings and therapeutic intervention in the same setting will help in reducing the time and cost of treatment.

Successful pregnancy outcome via in-vitro fertilization and laparoscopic resection of non-communicating rudimentary horn pregnancy containing early pregnancy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Non-communicating rudimentary horn pregnancy (NCRHP) lead to life-threatening condition for both mother and fetus. Early diagnosis of NCRHP and laparoscopic resection is important to prevent catastrophic conditions. However, delayed diagnosis until the second or third trimester makes it difficult to accurately diagnose between NCRHP and bicornuate uterine pregnancy, as both conditions present uterine rupture and massive hemoperitoneum. Furthermore, these rare cases are challenging in pregnancy trials and associated with adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies. CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old gravida 1 para 0 Korean woman visited our infertility center with a confirmed positive urine pregnancy test after timed intercourse. Before she was scheduled to have timed intercourse, a unicornuate uterus with a non-communicating right uterine horn was suspected based on an ultrasound scan and hysterosalpingography during the initial infertility workup. A gestational sac was observed in the right non-communicating rudimentary horn at 5 weeks of gestation. Serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (b-hCG) level was 2052.0mIU/mL. An elective laparoscopic resection of the right rudimentary horn containing a gestational sac, along with ipsilateral salpingectomy, was performed with no adverse event. After 3-month of recovery period and three cycles of conceptional trials involving timed intercourse and intrauterine insemination, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was performed using the antagonist protocol, and successful pregnancy was confirmed. The patient had been hospitalized from 21 + 6 weeks to 35 + 6 weeks of gestation, underwent cerclage placement and tocolytics with corticosteroid treatment. She delivered an early-term male baby by cesarean section. CONCLUSION: In this rare case, the successful pregnancy achieved through IVF following the appropriate management of NCRHP under laparoscopy underscores the critical importance of early diagnosis and intervention in cases of NCRHP. Timely identification and management of NCRHP are vital to prevent the occurrence of catastrophic conditions and to enhance the prognosis of a successful pregnancy through assisted reproductive technology (ART). Therefore, a high index of suspicion for NCRHP is important and employs a range of diagnostic modalities.

Outpatient hysteroscopy impact on subsequent assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis in patients with normal transvaginal sonography or hysterosalpingography images.

BACKGROUND: Standard management for intrauterine lesions typically involves initial imaging followed by operative hysteroscopy for suspicious findings. However, the efficacy of routine outpatient hysteroscopy in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) remains uncertain due to a lack of decisive high-quality evidence. This study aimed to determine whether outpatient hysteroscopy is beneficial for infertile women who have unremarkable imaging results prior to undergoing ART. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines, incorporating data up to May 31, 2023, from databases such as PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcome assessed was the live birth rate, with secondary outcomes including chemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy rates, and miscarriage rates. Statistical analysis involved calculating risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals and assessing heterogeneity with the I2 statistic. RESULTS: The analysis included ten randomized control trials. Receiving outpatient hysteroscopy before undergoing ART was associated with increased live birth (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.45, I2 61%) and clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.27 95% CI 1.10-1.47, I2 53%). Miscarriage rates did not differ significantly (RR 1.25, CI 0.90-1.76, I2 50%). Subgroup analyses did not show a significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates when comparing normal versus abnormal hysteroscopic findings (RR 1.01, CI 0.78-1.32, I2 38%). We analyzed data using both intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches, and our findings were consistent across both analytical methods. CONCLUSIONS: Office hysteroscopy may enhance live birth and clinical pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing ART, even when previous imaging studies show no apparent intrauterine lesions. Treating lesions not detected by imaging may improve ART outcomes. The most commonly missed lesions are endometrial polyps, submucosal fibroids and endometritis, which are all known to affect ART success rates. The findings suggested that hysteroscopy, given its diagnostic accuracy and patient tolerability, should be considered in the management of infertility. DATABASE REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systemic Review database (CRD42023476403).

Assessment of contrast intravasation in patients investigated by fluoroscopic hysterosalpingograms: A two-year retrospective audit in Western Australia.

INTRODUCTION: Intravasation on hysterosalpingogram (HSG) is defined by the flow of injected contrast from the uterine cavity into adjacent myometrial vessels. Evidence suggests intravasation can result in consequences such as pulmonary and cerebral embolisms. However, adverse events are poorly reported across published studies. Reported intravasation ranges from 0.0% to 13%, with higher rates attributed to oil-soluble contrast medium (OSCM) use. Recent reviews of OSCM's fertility-enhancing benefits have prompted rapid clinical uptake by fertility specialists worldwide. This instigates increased concern for intravasation and its associated sequelae. We aim to assess the prevalence of intravasation in fluoroscopic HSGs and its reporting in Western Australia (WA). METHODS: A two-year retrospective analysis of all fluoroscopic HSGs in one public teaching hospital within WA was conducted. All HSGs were retrieved from the public radiology information system and a blinded method was utilised to verify the presence and grading of intravasation in captured HSG images. Grading of intravasation was attributed by anatomical spread: 1 to myometrium, 2 to parametrium and 3 to para-iliac vessels. Results were subsequently compared with reported intravasation to assess for discrepancies. RESULTS: Of 308 successful HSGs, an intravasation rate of 7.1% was identified. Of these cases, 45% were reported and 32% were graded. Majority (73%) of intravasation events were classified as grade 1, with 9.0% and 18% of cases classified as grade 2 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Under-reporting of intravasation emphasises a need for increased vigilance of radiologists. Standardised classification can provide interpretational consistency and should be considered to improve safety in future practice.

Sequential-contingent strategy for fallopian tube evaluation using hysterosalpingo foam sonography: a cost analysis.

Background: Tubal pathology is the etiological factor in 20% of couples with female infertility. Historically, diagnostic evaluation of the fallopian tubes has been performed by means of hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosonosalpingography with EXEM® foam is a recent technique with supposedly comparable effectiveness to HSG, but with better tolerability for patients. Methods: Tubal patency was assessed in patients who were candidates for intrauterine insemination (IUI) between January 2020 and July 2021. (I) Hysterosonosalpingography with EXEM® foam. (II) If the patient had both tubes patent, IUI was proposed. In case of inconclusive or pathological results, HSG was performed. (III) If the HSG concludes tubal patency, IUI is proposed. On the other hand, if it results in tubal obstruction, in vitro fertilization (IVF) is proposed. Results: Assessment of tubal patency by HSG showed concordance with previous Hysterosonosalpingography with EXEM® foam results in 45.5% (n=15) of cases of unilateral obstruction and 66.7% (n=6) of cases of bilateral obstruction. When we compare the total cost of HSG (€54,899.46) with the sum of patients who only required Hysterosonosalpingography with EXEM® foam together with those who underwent both tests (€45,575.96), it shows that the latter represents a cost benefit strategy (cost difference €9,323.50). Conclusions: Our results suggest a benefit of €9,323.50 when performing the contingent sequential strategy, in case of pathological or inconclusive results, compared to performing a systematic HSG in all patients. Patients with an obstructive hysterosalpingogram with EXEM® and a patent hysterosalpingogram will be the subgroup that will benefit the most, as IUI can be proposed instead of IVF. In addition, there is a benefit in terms of optimizing the medical procedure, hospital visits and speeding up the time to start assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Utility of Repeat Uterine Cavity Evaluation in the Infertility Workup.

Background: Uterine cavity abnormalities contribute to infertility. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, recurrence rates, and risk factors for uterine cavity abnormalities in women undergoing infertility workup and treatment, focusing on the utility of routinely repeated imaging. Methods: Retrospective cohort study at single academic medical center of 833 infertile women who had uterine cavity evaluations performed at least 9 months apart. Results: Of 833 eligible patients, 664 (79.7%) had normal initial imaging and 169 (20.3%) had abnormal initial imaging. Among the former, 10% had abnormal uterine cavity on repeat saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS); among the latter, 32% had abnormal repeat SIS [Chi-square p < 0.0001, risk ratio 2.30 (95% confidence interval 1.85-2.86)]. On average, 23.1 ± 13.6 months passed between studies. Regardless of initial imaging findings, women with abnormal repeat SIS were older than those with normal repeat SIS, with no difference in time elapsed between studies. There were no associations between repeat imaging outcomes and body mass index, uterine instrumentation, number of treatment cycles, or maximum peak estradiol levels in a single cycle between studies. There was no difference in live birth rate among cycles started within 1 year after repeat SIS across groups. Conclusions: Uterine cavity abnormalities were found in 10% of patients on repeat imaging despite initially normal testing. No risk factors for cavity abnormality on repeat imaging were identified besides age and prior abnormality. It would be prudent to continue performing routine repeat uterine cavity evaluation for women undergoing fertility treatment, particularly if corrective measures had been taken in the past.

Revolutionizing Fallopian Tube Evaluation in Infertility: Transvaginal Sonography Case Study.

Background: Transvaginal four-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (TVS 4D-HyCoSy) is a pivotal diagnostic tool in the assessment and management of infertility. Conventionally, a 20mL syringe is employed for contrast agent injection, either at a constant or pulsatile pressure. However, in cases of bilateral fallopian tube obstruction, continued injection can lead to discomfort and excessive pressure within the uterine cavity, necessitating discontinuation of the examination. Case Presentation: In this illuminating case study, a patient underwent TVS 4D-HyCoSy due to infertility concerns. Initial contrast agent injection failed to visualize both fallopian tubes, accompanied by acute pain. Bilateral tubal obstruction was diagnosed, prompting an innovative approach. A 2.5mL syringe was chosen for pulsed injection, leading to successful visualization of patency in one fallopian tube. Remarkably, the patient achieved natural pregnancy within three months of the examination. Conclusion: Pulsed injection using a small-volume syringe emerges as a promising technique in cases of fallopian tube obstruction during TVS 4D-HyCoSy. This method not only enhances patient comfort but also improves the likelihood of visualizing fallopian tube patency, contributing to accurate infertility assessments. As a supplementary technique, it addresses limitations associated with constant pressure injection and offers a novel approach to enhance diagnostic success.

Corrigendum: Fertility-enhancing effect of oil-based contrast agents during hysterosalpingography and the variation of this effect within a 3-year follow-up period in infertile patients.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.948945.].

Effect of interval time between hysterosalpingography and intrauterine insemination on the pregnancy outcome of infertile patients.

Background: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is the most commonly applied tubal patency test in clinical practice. Although some studies have found an increased pregnancy rate after HSG, no studies to date have specifically characterized the effect of interval time between HSG and IUI on pregnancy outcome. Objectives: To investigate the effect of interval time between HSG and intrauterine insemination (IUI) on live birth rates of infertile patients. Methods: Retrospective cohort study. The reproductive medical record system was used to identify patients who completed ≥1 IUI cycle between January 2017 and October 2021. According to the interval time between HSG and IUI, patients were divided into three groups: <6months interval group,6-12 months interval group and >12 months interval group. The generalized estimating equation with Poisson distribution was used to estimate the risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of different groups. Results: A total of 413 patients completed 701 IUI cycles during the study period, <6months interval group, 415 cycles; 6-12 months interval group, 138 cycles; >12 months interval group, 148 cycles. The live birth rate of <6 months group was higher than other two groups (17.35% vs. 12.32% vs. 8.11%, P=0.017); Similarly, the clinical pregnancy rate of <6 months group was also higher than other two groups (19.76% vs. 14.49% vs.11.49%, P=0.049). When adjusted separately for FSH, AMH, infertility type, duration of infertility, infertility diagnosis, total motile count (TMC) of sperm, medications, endometrium size and dominant follicle size, the live birth rate of >12 months group severally significantly decreased by 60% (adjusted RR = 0.40, 95% CI [0.19-1.40]). The cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of <6 months group were higher than other two groups (P<0.05), but the cumulative pregnancy rate among three groups were not statistically different (log rank test: P=0.06). Conclusion: The interval time between hysterosalpingography and IUI is related to pregnancy outcome. The clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were the highest when the time interval was less than 6 months. Therefore, IUI should be recommend as soon as possible after HSG if the patient couple meets the IUI indication.

Fertility and anatomical outcomes following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: An 11-year retrospective cohort study to validate a new classification system for intrauterine adhesions (Urman-Vitale Classification System).

OBJECTIVE: To propose a new classification system (Urman-Vitale Classification System) for intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) and to evaluate anatomical and fertility outcomes after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis accordingly. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated over 11 years by a single operator in a tertiary care hospital. Women with sonographic suspicion of IUAs were scheduled for hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysteroscopy for confirmation and treatment. IUAs were divided into five classes according to symptoms, ultrasound, HSG findings, and postsurgical hysteroscopic appearance. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was performed using a bipolar cutting electrode in an office setting. Evaluated outcomes were restoration of the uterine cavity, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live birth rates. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients (479 procedures) were included. Mean number of hysteroscopies increased in frequency with class of adhesions from Class 1 to Class 5 (1.0 ± 0.2 vs 2.3 ± 0.5; P = 0.001). Full restoration of the cavity was achieved in 100% of patients with Class 1 compared with 18.5% for Class 5 (43/43 vs 5/27; P = 0.001). Clinical pregnancy (Class 1 vs Class 4: P = 0.034; 1 vs 5: P = 0.006; 2 vs 5: P = 0.024) and live birth (Class 1 vs Class 4: P = 0.001; 1 vs 5: P = 0.006; 2 vs 4: P = 0.007; 2 vs 5: P = 0.0208) rates decreased with increasing severity of IUAs. Pregnancy loss rate was related to IUA severity (Class 1 vs Class 4: P = 0.012; 1 vs 5: P = 0.003: 2 vs 4: P = 0.014; 2 vs 5: P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: A classification based on symptoms, imaging findings, and postsurgical macroscopic appearance of the uterine cavity could be useful in predicting prognosis and fertility in women with IUAs.

Evaluation of the Success of Hysteroscopic Uterine Septum Resection.

Objectives: The aim is to use three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography (3-D TVUS) to evaluate the success of hysteroscopic metroplasty for the uterine septum and to compare the pregnancy outcomes. Materials and Methods: Thirty-eight patients with uterine septum who had hysteroscopic uterine septum resection were recruited. Preoperative 3-D TVUS measurements of the septal apex to the uterine fundus (s1), septal apex to internal os distance (s2), and intercornual distance (s3) were compared with the postoperative values. The pregnancies of the patients were followed up for a year postoperative period. Results: Out of the 38 patients, thirty-five had partial uterine septum (class U2a), while 3 patients had complete uterine septum (class U2b). Eighteen (47.36%) of the patients who underwent uterine septum resection achieved pregnancy, and thirteen of these pregnancies were (72.2%) term pregnancies, and all term pregnancies resulted in a live birth. Natural conception was achieved in 77.7% (14 of 18) of the patients. Term pregnancy occurred in 68.7% (11 of 16) of the patients with a partial septum and in 66.6% (2 of 3) of the patients with a complete uterine septum. A comparison of the 3-D TVUS measurements of the uterus pre- and postoperatively showed a decrease in s1 and an increase in s2 (P < 0.05). The uterine cavity length of pregnant patients was found to be higher than nonpregnant patients (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Reproductive results of hysteroscopic metroplasty were favorable in achieving live and term birth. three-dimensional TVUS can be preferred as a noninvasive effective method in objective evaluation of the success of the hysteroscopic surgery.

What are the risks associated with lipiodol hysterosalpingography? A literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Hysterosalpingography is widely used as a first-line investigation for infertility, and may also be therapeutic, increasing pregnancy rates. Aqueous and oil-based contrast agents can be used. Some studies suggest Lipiodol hysterosalpingography has a greater therapeutic effect on fertility than aqueous contrast, though this is contentious. There are additionally safety concerns surrounding Lipiodol hysterosalpingography. This review summarises the adverse effects associated with Lipiodol hysterosalpingography, particularly on thyroid function. KEY FINDINGS: 331 articles were identified. Of these, 46 met inclusion criteria. 3 further articles were identified from reference lists. Complications typically cited in the literature include pain, intravasation, life-threatening oil embolism, and lipogranuloma formation. Emerging evidence suggests that Lipiodol hysterosalpingography may also impact maternal and neonatal thyroid function. Women may develop hypo- or hyperthyroidism. Thyroid dysfunction is clinically significant as even subclinical hypothyroidism reduces fertility, increases the risk of pregnancy complications including miscarriage, pre-eclampsia and perinatal mortality, and adversely impacts foetal neurodevelopment. One study suggested a possible link with neonatal congenital hypothyroidism. CONCLUSION: There is emerging evidence to suggest that Lipiodol hysterosalpingography can cause hypo- or hyperthyroidism, in addition to known adverse effects of pain, intravasation, oil embolism, and lipogranuloma formation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Given the significance of these risks, and contention surrounding whether Lipiodol truly increases pregnancy rates compared to aqueous mediums, careful consideration is required in the selection of contrast agent. In particular, Lipiodol hysterosalpingography may not be suitable for women with pre-existing thyroid dysfunction.

Comparison of fertility outcomes between oil­based and water­based contrast media during hysterosalpingography: A meta­analysis.

Water-based and oil-based contrast media are both widely used in clinical practice for patients receiving hysterosalpingography (HSG). However, minor controversy exists about whether the oil-based contrast medium has a superior fertility-enhancing effect during HSG. The present meta-analysis intended to comprehensively compare the fertility outcomes of patients receiving either an oil-based or a water-based contrast medium during HSG. Web of Science, PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data and China Science and Technology Journal Database were examined for literature comparing the fertility enhancement between oil-based and water-based contrast media during HSG up to November 10, 2022 and there was no cut off for studies published earlier than any given year. Data for clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy were extracted and analyzed. A total of 11 studies with 2,462 patients receiving oil-based contrast medium and 2,830 patients receiving water-based contrast medium during HSG were included. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were presented for outcome assessment, and the random effects model was utilized for all analyses. Publication bias was analyzed using Egger's and Begg's tests. The results indicated that the rate of clinical pregnancy was increased using oil-based contrast medium compared with water-based contrast medium [relative risk (RR) (95% CI), 1.29 (1.07, 1.54); P=0.006]. In addition, the rate of ongoing pregnancy [RR (95% CI), 1.39 (1.22, 1.59); P#x003C;0.001] and live birth [RR (95% CI), 1.41 (1.07, 1.87); P=0.016] were also increased using oil-based contrast medium compared with water-based contrast medium. However, miscarriage [RR (95% CI), 1.06 (0.61, 1.86); P=0.833] and ectopic pregnancy [RR (95% CI), 0.66 (0.18, 2.36); P=0.518] were not affected by using oil-based or water-based contrast medium. Begg's test and Egger's test suggested that no publication bias of clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy existed (all P>0.05), which indicated the stability of the present meta-analysis. In conclusion, the oil-based contrast medium enhances fertility outcomes compared with the water-based contrast medium in patients receiving HSG.

Chlamydia trachomatis seropositivity among women with tubal factor infertility and fertile controls: a comparative study.

Introduction: Chlamydia trachomatis is the most reported bacterial sexually transmitted infection and if not properly treated may lead to tubal blockage. Tubal factor infertility is the most common form of infertility in Nigeria. This study was designed to determine the usefulness of chlamydia antibody testing in diagnosis of tubal factor infertility. Methods: this was a comparative cross-sectional study conducted in Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital Sagamu. One hundred and forty-seven women with tubal blockage on hysterosalpingography and confirmed with laparoscopy, and pregnant control were recruited using convenience sampling method. Information obtained and chlamydia assay results were entered into a computer and analyzed using SPSS version 21. Chi-square was used to determine association between categorical variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors associated with chlamydia infection. Results: ninety-four (63.9%) of the women with tubal factor infertility were positive for chlamydia IgG antibodies while 37(25.2%) women in the control group had positive results for IgG antibody. This was statistically significant (P=0.001). Analysis using multivariate logistic regression shows early age of coitarche, presence of multiple sexual partners and previous sexually transmitted infection were significantly associated with chlamydia infection (P=0.001). Conclusion: there was a strong association between chlamydia seropositivity and tubal blockage. Early age at coitarche, previous sexually transmitted infection and multiple sexual partners are significant risk factors for chlamydial infection. Chlamydia trachomatis antibody testing could be used as marker for tubal blockage when evaluating infertile patient.

Comparison of Hysterosalpingography and Laparoscopy in the Evaluation of Infertility: A Prospective Study.

Background: Worldwide one of the major problems of human reproduction that haunts men and women is infertility. Hysterosalpingography (HSG) and laparoscopy (LS) are the two most important modalities to evaluate infertility. Our aim is to compare the efficacy of both. Methodology: This is a prospective study. One hundred and five females of both primary and secondary infertility together were included. Detailed history, examination and routine investigations were carried out. Tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction (TBPCR) was made from endometrial biopsy sample for all patients. Ovulation study was done by transvaginal ultrasonography. Hysterosalpingography and diagnostic laparoscopy were done. Results: Out of 105 infertile patients, 51.42% were in 26-30 years group. 52.3% were from lower economic group. 55.23% presented between 1 to 5 years of infertility. Twelve patients had used contraception in the past. Sixteen patients were serologically positive. Twenty-nine patients were with positive TBPCR among 105 females. Fifty-four and fifty-six patients had patent tubes by HSG and laparoscopy, respectively. Uterine filling defects and congenital anomalies could be detected four times more by HSG than by laparoscopy. TO mass was detected only by laparoscopy. Bilateral spill was present in 66.6% by HSG and 67.6% by laparoscopy and unilateral spillage in 22.8% and 21.9%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of HSG in predicting unilateral block taking laparoscopy as gold standard are 85%, 96.4% and 94.2%, respectively, and sensitivity and specificity of bilateral tubal block are 81.8% and 98%, respectively. Conclusions: HSG and laparoscopy are not alternative, but complimentary in diagnosing tubal pathologies. HSG remains as primary screening procedure, but laparoscopy is gold standard.

Optimizing intrauterine insemination and spontaneous conception in women with unilateral hydrosalpinx or tubal pathology: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Tubal surgery's role in infertile women with unilateral tubal pathology (e.g. hydrosalpinx, tubal occlusion) who desire spontaneous or intrauterine insemination (IUI) conception where in-vitro fertilisation is infeasible remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review on fertility outcomes in women with unilateral tubal pathology desiring to conceive spontaneously or via IUI and to find guidance to support therapeutic tubal procedures to help these women conceive. SEARCH STRATEGY: Using a protocol registered on PROSPERO (ID CRD42021248720), we searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from inception until June 2022. Bibliographies were reviewed to identify other relevant articles. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by a third author. Studies presenting fertility outcome data in infertile women with unilateral tubal pathologies desiring spontaneous or IUI conception were included. Methodologic quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Institute of Health Economics Quality Appraisal Checklist for case series. Primary outcomes collated included cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) and pregnancy rate per cycle (PR/cycle). Secondary outcomes such as ectopic pregnancy, birth outcomes, and pelvic inflammatory disease were collated. These were stratified by the types of unilateral tubal occlusion (UTO) i.e. hydrosalpinx, proximal tubal occlusion (PTO), or distal tubal occlusion (DTO) MAIN RESULTS: Two studies reported spontaneous or IUI pregnancies after treatment of unilateral hydrosalpinx with one reporting a pregnancy rate of 88% within 5.6 months on average. Thirteen studies compared IUI outcomes between women with UTO vs unexplained infertility and bilateral tubal patency (controls). Almost all were retrospective cohort studies and identified UTO by hysterosalpingography. In general, PTOs had no difference in PR/cycle and CPR compared to controls and significantly higher PR/cycle to DTOs. Women with DTOs had minimal incremental CPR benefit with each additional IUI cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic salpingectomy or tubal occlusion improve IUI or spontaneous conception in women with hydrosalpinx, although more prospective studies are needed. While significant study heterogeneity hampered assessment of fertility outcomes, overall, infertile women with PTOs had similar IUI pregnancy outcomes to those with bilateral tubal patency while DTOs had inferior PR/cycle. This review highlights significant deficiencies in the evidence guiding management for this group of patients.

Impact of tubal patency test selection on the live birth rate following intrauterine insemination in couples with unexplained infertility: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: We planned a study to evaluate the impact of selecting hysterosalpingography (HSG) over diagnostic laparoscopy during initial fertility evaluation on IUI treatment outcomes in couples diagnosed with unexplained infertility. METHODS: The study comprised a retrospective cohort and included couples evaluated for infertility at our tertiary level hospital between January 2008 and December 2019. Couples diagnosed with unexplained infertility based on tubal patency tests (either HSG or diagnostic laparoscopy) were included. We compared outcomes following ovarian stimulation (OS) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) between women who underwent HSG versus laparoscopy for up to three treatment cycles. RESULTS: A total of 7413 women were screened, out of which 1002 women were diagnosed with unexplained infertility. We did not find a significant statistical difference in the clinical pregnancy (16.7% vs. 11.7%; OR (odds ratio) 1.51; 95% CI (confidence interval) 0.90-2.5) or live birth rate per IUI cycle (15.1% vs. 10.7%; OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.9-2.6) in women who underwent HSG for tubal evaluation as compared to laparoscopy. After adjustment for potential confounders through multivariate analysis, we found that outcomes were comparable between the HSG and laparoscopy. CONCLUSION: The current study did not find any significant difference in treatment outcomes following OS and IUI in women with unexplained infertility who underwent HSG compared to laparoscopy for the assessment of the tubal patency during the initial fertility workup. The finding suggests minimal or no impact of selecting HSG over diagnostic laparoscopy as a tubal patency test on the subsequent IUI outcomes.